Achievements in the field of neural implants and genetic engineering suggest that in the near future we will be able to strengthen human intellect. Let’s assume. If we succeed, should we take the younger brothers with us? Improving the human brain is becoming an increasingly discussed topic. The neuroscientist at Duke University, Mikhail Lebedev, said in July that it could take several decades before neurointerfaces that strengthen the brain could be used outside the medical field. However, he is confident that these technologies, as well as pharmacology and genetic engineering, will almost certainly allow us to improve our mental abilities.
Cognitive improvements are good or bad and how we can regulate them – these questions have to be answered by philosophers, futurists and bioethics. A separate question is whether we should use cognitive improvements in relation to animals. The possibilities are astounding.
Scientists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology found that mice that were genetically modified to express the human FOXP2 gene, responsible for teaching and speech processing, quickly passed the labyrinth. Another group from Wake Forest University, studying Alzheimer’s disease, found that neuronal implants can increase the rhesus-macaque score during the tests for intelligence.
The concept of “lifting animals” is best known for the film “Planet of the Apes”. But the proponents of the concept are less pessimistic about the results.
Fiction writer David Breen popularized this concept in a series of novels “Rise” in which people share the world with other animals and all lay out unique skills, perspectives and innovations on the table. “After several hundred years, the benefits will be amazing,” the author told in an interview.
Others, such as George Dvorsky of the Institute of Ethics and New Technologies, believe that there is a moral imperative. He says that abandoning the use of improved technologies on animals will be as unethical as banning their use for certain groups of people.
There are also third parties who do not think so. Alex Napp of Forbes notes that the development of technologies for raising animals will require a lot of invasive research on animals that will bring immense suffering to the same animals that we want to help. This presents a problem with ordinary animals, but what about those whose cognitive abilities have already been improved?
The whole concept can also be based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of the mind. People view intellect as a single, self-sufficient metric that develops linearly and at the top of it there is a crown-a person.
Kevin Kelly and Wired argue that science does not have a single scale for evaluating the intelligence of different species. Each of them combines a set of cognitive possibilities, some of which are much lower than our own, and some are much higher. The squirrel, for example, can remember the exact location of thousands of acorns for many years.
Attempts to strengthen the intelligence of animals can ultimately not result in giving our brothers less reason, but to make them more human. This is “a sort of benevolent colonialism,” which means that humane means good, says Paul Graham Raven, a futurist from the University of Sheffield.
There are also fundamental barriers that can make it difficult for animals to achieve cognitive abilities similar to human ones, no matter how advanced the technology of enhancing intelligence. In 2013, Swedish scientists selectively withdrew a small fish-guppies with large brains. Fish became smarter, but the appearance of an energy-intensive organ led to the fact that the guppies developed small intestines and produced fewer offspring.
Raising animals may require more than just brain changes, it may be necessary to completely rework physiology, which can be technically more difficult than increasing the human brain.
Our intellect is closely related to our evolutionary history – our brains are greater than those of other animals; opposing thumbs allow the use of tools; vocal cords make possible a complex communication. No matter how much you increase the brain to a cow, it still can not use a screwdriver or tell you an anecdote, because it does not have the right tools.
Finally, from a purely selfish point of view, even if we manage to create equal rules of the game for us and other animals, for humanity this can be an unreasonable step. There is no reason to believe that animals will be more benevolent than we are.